Live Phone Call Message from – Morgan Trowland. #TheBigOne #UniteToSurvive

We here at #GCBRandTCSL stand with @JustStop_Oil, with #Marcus and #Morgan, and everyone acting to end the insanity of climate collapse. We believe in the meaning of Protesting especially when we have a Government who continue to short fall their British Society. In delivery, accountability, transparency and integrity for the real true scale for our Climate Emergency.  #ParisAgreement #LostandDamned #COP28 #YouthNetwork #YouthMovement #FridaysForFuture #ClimateStrike #TomorrowIsTooLate

#JustStopOil #Solidarity #PeoplePower

#PublicOderBill ⬇️
I’m sorry, could you please provide more information or context about what you mean by “Public Oder Bill”? It would be helpful to know which country or jurisdiction you are referring to and any other relevant details.

#UKLegislations 🧵
I believe you may be referring to the UK’s proposed Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, which has been controversially dubbed the “Public Order Bill” by some critics.

The bill, which was introduced in March 2021, contains a range of provisions related to law enforcement, criminal justice, and sentencing. Some of the key provisions include:

• Expanding police powers to crack down on protests that cause “serious disruption” or “annoyance”

• Introducing tougher sentences for certain offenses, such as child murder and terrorism

• Creating new offenses for causing damage to memorials and statues, as well as for “public nuisance” behavior such as setting off fireworks or blocking roads

• Allowing police to impose conditions on protests and other public gatherings, such as setting start and finish times, and requiring protesters to stick to a specific route

The bill has been met with significant opposition from civil liberties groups, activists, and some politicians, who argue that it represents a threat to free speech and the right to protest. Critics have expressed concern that the bill’s provisions could be used to stifle dissent and undermine democracy, particularly in the context of the Black Lives Matter movement and other social justice campaigns.

The bill has not yet been passed into law, and its future is uncertain. Some members of parliament have called for it to be scrapped entirely, while others have suggested that it should be amended to address some of the concerns raised by its opponents.

#Disadvantages and #ShortFalls of the UK Public Oder Bill ⬇️
The UK’s proposed Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, which has been controversially dubbed the “Public Order Bill” by some critics, has faced significant opposition from civil liberties groups, activists, and some politicians. Some of the disadvantages and shortfalls of the bill, as argued by its opponents, include:

• Threat to free speech: The bill’s provisions related to protests and public gatherings have been criticized for potentially limiting the right to free expression and assembly. The bill would allow police to impose conditions on protests and other public gatherings, such as setting start and finish times, and requiring protesters to stick to a specific route. Critics argue that this could be used to stifle dissent and undermine democracy, particularly in the context of the Black Lives Matter movement and other social justice campaigns.

• Overreach of police powers: The bill’s provisions related to protests and public gatherings have also been criticized for giving police excessive powers. For example, the bill would expand police powers to crack down on protests that cause “serious disruption” or “annoyance,” which critics argue is vague and could be interpreted too broadly.

• Disproportionate sentencing: The bill’s provisions related to sentencing have been criticized for potentially leading to disproportionate punishments for certain offenses. For example, the bill would introduce tougher sentences for certain offenses, such as child murder and terrorism, but critics argue that these sentences could be too harsh and could lead to over-incarceration.

• Lack of consultation: The bill has been criticized for being introduced without sufficient consultation with the public or civil society groups. Critics argue that this has led to a lack of transparency and accountability, and that the bill’s provisions have not been subject to proper scrutiny or debate.

Overall, opponents of the bill argue that it represents a threat to civil liberties and could undermine democracy in the UK. While the bill has not yet been passed into law, its provisions have sparked significant debate and controversy, and its future remains uncertain.

#OnlineSafetyBill ⬇️
The Online Safety Bill is a proposed piece of legislation in the United Kingdom that aims to create a safer online environment for internet users. The bill was first introduced in 2021 and is currently in the process of being reviewed and debated in Parliament.

The bill seeks to establish a regulatory framework for online safety, with the goal of preventing harm such as cyberbullying, online abuse, and the spread of harmful content. It proposes the creation of a new regulatory body, called the Online Safety Regulator, which would be responsible for enforcing the new rules.

Under the proposed legislation, internet service providers and social media companies would be required to take steps to protect users from harmful content and to remove such content from their platforms. They would also be required to take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content, such as pornography and violent or extremist material.

The bill also proposes new criminal offenses for certain types of harmful online behavior, such as cyberflashing, which involves sending unsolicited sexual images, and the distribution of intimate images without consent.

While the bill has been broadly welcomed as a step towards creating a safer online environment, some have expressed concerns about its potential impact on free speech and the ability of small businesses and startups to comply with the new regulations.

Overall, the Online Safety Bill represents an attempt to address the growing concern about the negative impact of the internet on society, and to create a regulatory framework that can keep pace with the rapid changes in online technology and behavior.

#DisadvantagesandShortFalls of the Online Safety Bill ⬇️

While the Online Safety Bill aims to create a safer online environment for internet users, there are also some potential disadvantages and shortfalls associated with the proposed legislation. Here are some of the most commonly cited concerns:

• Free speech: One of the biggest concerns with the Online Safety Bill is that it could restrict free speech. Critics argue that the proposed legislation could be used to censor content that is considered controversial or politically sensitive, leading to a chilling effect on freedom of expression.

• Over-regulation: Another concern is that the Online Safety Bill could be overly burdensome for smaller internet service providers and social media companies, who may struggle to comply with the new regulations. This could lead to a consolidation of power among larger tech companies who have the resources to comply with the new rules.

• Technological limitations: The Online Safety Bill places a heavy emphasis on content moderation, which relies on technology such as artificial intelligence to identify and remove harmful content. However, there are concerns that these technologies are not yet sophisticated enough to accurately identify all types of harmful content, leading to the potential for false positives or missed content.

• Lack of clarity: Some critics have also argued that the Online Safety Bill lacks clarity on what constitutes harmful content, which could lead to confusion and inconsistency in its enforcement.

• Privacy concerns: The bill gives the Online Safety Regulator the power to request user data from internet service providers and social media companies in order to investigate potential breaches of the legislation. This has raised concerns about potential breaches of privacy and data protection.

In summary, while the Online Safety Bill has the potential to make the internet a safer place, there are also legitimate concerns about its impact on free speech, its potential to over-regulate, technological limitations, lack of clarity and privacy concerns.

▪︎ BREAKING: MORGAN AND MARCUS SENTENCED TO 3 YEARS IN PRISON FOR DEMANDING A LIVEABLE FUTURE FOR ALL

Link – https://www.instagram.com/reel/CrbkPY8I4I8/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

▪︎ Morgan and Marcus, who scaled the Dartford Crossing bridge in October last year, have been sentenced to three years and two years and seven months in prison, respectively — the longest sentences for peaceful climate action in UK history.

#DartfordCrossing #QE2Bridge #M25

#GCBRandTCSL

#TheClaudesSENLaw
Stay updated with next post in regards to The Claudes SEN Law Campaign. In the next coming days. ✍🏾✊🏾📢 #TheClaudesSENLaw